Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Santa Fe?
Yes, Santa Fe's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Santa Fe has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page or the city's water provider website.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Santa Fe's water utility, City of Santa Fe Water System (), had 2 non-health-based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. The last violation for Santa Fe was resolved on June 30, 2019. This assessment is based on the City of Santa Fe Water System () water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Santa Fe Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Santa Fe tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Santa Fe's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Santa Fe Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named City of Santa Fe Water System () for Santa Fe in New Mexico. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
From June 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019, Santa Fe had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From June 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019, Santa Fe had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.
For the compliance period beginning April 1, 2017, Santa Fe had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Failure to Notify Other PWS which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Groundwater Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Groundwater Rule.
For the compliance period beginning June 2, 2016, Santa Fe had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Sample Siting Plan Errors (RTCR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Total Coliform Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Revised Total Coliform Rule.
From June 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016, Santa Fe had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Routine (RTCR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Total Coliform Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Revised Total Coliform Rule.
Is there Lead in Santa Fe Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Santa Fe water system, City of Santa Fe Water System (), between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.00093 mg/L of lead in Santa Fe water. This is 6.2% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Santa Fe contained more lead.
While Santa Fe water testing may have found 0.00093 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Santa Fe Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be at least one military base - Santa Fe AASF - near Santa Fe with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Santa Fe has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
Santa Fe SDWA Violation History Table - Prior 10 Years
Compliance Period | Status | Health-Based? | Category Code | Code | Rule Code | Contaminant Code | Rule Group Code | Rule Family Code |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) (36) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (121) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (0200) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) (38) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
04/01/2017 - | Resolved | No | Other Violation (Other) | Failure to Notify Other PWS (73) | Ground Water Rule (140) | Groundwater Rule (0700) | Microbials (100) | Groundwater Rule (140) |
06/02/2016 - | Resolved | No | Other Violation (Other) | Sample Siting Plan Errors (RTCR) (5A) | Revised Total Coliform Rule (111) | Revised Total Coliform Rule (8000) | Microbials (100) | Total Coliform Rules (110) |
06/01/2016 - 06/30/2016 | Resolved | No | Monitoring Violation (MON) | Monitoring, Routine (RTCR) (3A) | Revised Total Coliform Rule (111) | Revised Total Coliform Rule (8000) | Microbials (100) | Total Coliform Rules (110) |
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
Santa Fe Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Mail: | P.O. Box 90 1780 Canyon Road SANTA FE, NM, 87501-0909 |
Existing customers can login to their City of Santa Fe Water System () account to pay their Santa Fe water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your City of Santa Fe Water System () bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Santa Fe water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Santa Fe water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Santa Fe means you will often need to put the water in your name with City of Santa Fe Water System (). In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Santa Fe means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with City of Santa Fe Water System (). In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$1.66 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Santa Fe, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Santa Fe Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Santa Fe's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
City of Santa Fe 2020 Water Quality Table
Regulated Compliance Monitoring
|
Note: |
|
City wellfield: Alto, Agua Fria, Ferguson, Osage, St. Mikes & Torreon. |
•a) |
|
|
|
b) |
Buckman Wells |
• |
2020 Water Quality Report
City of Santa Fe Water Division P.O. Box 909, Santa Fe, NM 87504 |
Customer Service (505) |
Contaminant |
Units |
MCL |
MCLG |
City Well |
Sample |
Buckman |
Sample |
Canyon Road |
Sample |
Buckman |
Sample |
Violation |
Typical Source |
|||
Field a |
Year |
Tank b |
Year |
WTP |
Year |
RWTP |
Year |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Synthetic Organic Contaminants c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Dichloromethane |
PPB |
5 |
|
|
0 |
ND |
2020 |
0.7 |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
No |
Discharge from pharmaceutical and chemical |
|
|
|
factories |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inorganic Contaminants c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Arsenic |
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erosion of natural deposits; Runoff from |
|
PPB |
10 |
|
0 |
2020 |
1.8 |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
No |
orchards; Runoff from glass and electronics |
||||
|
(1.1 - 1.9) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
production wastes |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Barium |
PPM |
2 |
|
|
2 |
0.6 |
2020 |
0.03 |
2020 |
0.008 |
2020 |
0.04 |
2020 |
No |
Discharge from drilling wastes; Discharge from |
|
|
|
(0.2 - 0.6) |
metal refineries; Erosion of natural deposits |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluoride |
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erosion of natural deposits; Water additive which |
|
PPM |
4 |
|
|
4 |
2020 |
0.39 |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
0.37 |
2020 |
No |
promotes strong teeth; Discharge from fertilizer |
|||
|
|
(ND - 0.2) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and aluminum factories |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nitrate [as N] |
PPM |
10 |
|
10 |
5.4 |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
No |
Runoff from fertilizer use; Leaching from septic |
||
|
(2.5 - 5.4) |
tanks, sewage; Erosion from natural deposits |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selenium |
|
|
|
|
|
0.004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharge from petroleum and metal refineries; |
|
PPM |
50 |
|
50 |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
No |
Erosion of natural deposits; Discharge from |
||||
|
(ND - 0.004) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mines |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Radioactive Contaminants c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gross Alpha Emitters d |
pCi/L |
15 |
|
0 |
0.9 |
2017 - 2020 |
0.9 |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
No |
Erosion of natural deposits |
||
|
(0.2 - 0.9) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Beta/Photon |
pCi/L |
50 e |
|
NA |
1.4 |
2017 - 2020 |
2.8 |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
2.7 |
2020 |
No |
Decay of natural and |
||
Emitters |
|
|
|
|
|
(ND - 1.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Radium 226/228 |
pCi/L |
5 |
|
|
0 |
0.8 |
2017 - 2020 |
0.04 |
2020 |
0.08 |
2020 |
0.25 |
2020 |
No |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
|
|
(0.4 - 0.8) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Uranium |
PPB |
30 |
|
0 |
1 |
2017 - 2020 |
2 |
2020 |
ND |
2020 |
2 |
2020 |
No |
Erosion of natural deposits |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Surface Water |
Contaminants c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Turbidity (highest single |
NTU |
TT = 1.0 |
|
0 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.26 |
2020 |
0.26 |
2020 |
No |
Soil Runoff |
||
measurement) |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Turbidity (lowest monthly |
NTU |
TT = |
|
0 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
100% |
2020 |
100% |
2020 |
No |
Soil Runoff |
||
% meeting limits) |
% <0.3 NTU |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Organic Carbon |
|
|
f |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
1.0 g |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
TT |
|
2020 |
NA |
NA |
No |
Naturally present in the environment |
|||||||||
(removal ratio) |
|
|
(1.0 - 1.8) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The range represents the highest and lowest values within the Compliance |
•c) |
|||
|
|
|
Period indicated, if more than one sample was collected. |
|
|
|
Gross Alpha Emitters excluding Radon and Uranium |
•d) |
|||
|
|
|
EPA considers 50 pCi/L to be the level of concern for beta particles. |
•e) |
|
|
|
|
Alternative compliance criteria used to meet TOC removal requirements |
||
•f ) |
|||
|
|
|
(running annual average of TOC removal ratio must be >1 each month) |
g) |
|
|
Running annual average (RAA) of TOC removal ratio for each month during |
• |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 - minimum ratio was 1.0 (as per 40 CFR 141.135) |
|
|
|
Key to Units, Terms and Abbreviations
NA: |
Not Applicable. |
ND: |
Not Detected. |
NTU: |
Nephelometric Turbidity Units. |
PPM: |
parts per million, or milligrams per liter (mg/L). |
PPB: |
parts per billion, or micrograms per liter (µg/L). |
pCi/L: |
picocuries per liter (a measure of radioactivity). |
µg/L: |
Number of micrograms of substance per liter of water. |
mg/L: |
Number of milligrams of substance per liter of water. |
(Range): The range represents the highest and lowest values. Range values are not provided if only one sample was taken during the range period.
AL: Action level: The concentration of a contaminant, which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements, which a water system must follow.
LRAA: Locational running annual average - the average of analytical results for samples at a particular monitoring location during the previous four calendar quarters. LRAA at each sampling location must be below the MCL (60 µg/L for Total Haloacetic Acids and 80 µg/L for Total Trihalomethanes)
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCL’s are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL) – The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG) – The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
- Treatment Technique: a required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.
The City of Santa Fe’s Water Division (the City) is pleased to provide the 2020 Water Quality Report for Water System NM3505126. A safe and dependable water supply is vital to our community and is the primary mission of the City. This report is provided annually and contains information on the quality of water obtained throughout the calendar year or most recent monitoring period. In 2020, the City’s drinking water met all U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State drinking water quality limits. The report contains additional details about where your water comes from, what it contains, and how it compares to standards set by federal and state regulatory agencies. It also provides educational
information on contaminants which may be a concern.
Sources of Supply
The City was served by four distinct sources of supply in 2020. The 17,000 acre Santa Fe Watershed provides surface runoff to the Santa Fe River where it is stored in the McClure and Nichols Reservoir prior to treatment. Surface water from the Santa Fe River and Rio Grande is treated through conventional and advanced treatment processes at the Canyon Road Water Treatment Plant and Buckman Regional Water Treatment Plant (BRWTP) (separate Water System NM3502826), respectively. The City Well Field is mostly located in close proximity to the Santa Fe River and consists of 6 active wells located within the City limits of Santa Fe. The Buckman Well Field consists of 13 wells located near the Rio Grande, approximately 15 miles northwest of Santa Fe. All four sources are treated with chlorine for protection of customers against
In 2011, the Buckman Direct Diversion (BDD) Project surface water supply was successfully integrated into the municipal distribution system and operated in conjunction with the City’s
Do I need to take special precautions?
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno- compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
Map of Water Sources
Source of Supply
Source Water Assessment
and its Availability
The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) completed a Source Water Assessment for the City of Santa Fe. This assessment includes a determination of source water protection areas and an inventory of pollution sources within the areas of concern. NMED concluded: “The Susceptibility Analysis of the City of Santa Fe water utility reveals that the utility is well maintained and operated, and the sources of drinking water are generally protected from potential sources of contamination based on an evaluation of the available information. The susceptibility rank of the entire water system is “moderately low”. A copy of the Assessment is available by contacting NMED at (505)
City ordinances adopted in 2005 built upon the recommendations in the Source Water Assessment. The “Safe Drinking Water and Source Water Protection” and the “Stormwater Illicit Discharge Control” ordinances provide additional controls and protections for the City’s ground and surface water supplies. In addition, the City established a Stormwater Program with the goal of reducing pollutants discharged to the Santa Fe River. Please contact (505) 955- 5644 to report illegal dumping in storm drains, streets and arroyos.
En Espanol
Este reporte contiene información importante sobre la calidad del agua en Santa Fe. Si tiene alguna pregunta o duda sobre este reporte puede hablarle a Patricio Pacheco al teléfono (505)
Contacts for Additional Information:
If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions regarding this report please contact Jonathan Montoya at (505)
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2021.indd 1
4/21/2021 8:49:11 AM
Why are there Contaminants
in my Drinking Water?
Sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. Contaminants in drinking water may include:
- Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife.
-
Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals can be
naturally-occurring or result from urbanstorm-water runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining or farming. -
Pesticides and herbicides, may come from a variety of sources, such as agriculture, urban
storm-water runoff, and residential uses. -
Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, are
by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gas stations, urban storm water runoff, and septic systems. -
Radioactive contaminants, which can be naturally occurring,
man-made from nuclear facilities and atmospheric deposition from former above ground testing, or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities.
In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water, which must provide the same protection for public health.
Nitrates
City of Santa Fe drinking water meets the federal drinking water standard of 10 PPM for nitrates (10 mg/L as N). Nitrates have been detected in some of
the City Wells up to 5.4 PPM. Nitrate in drinking water at levels above 10 PPM is a health risk for infants of less than six months of age. High nitrate levels in drinking water can cause blue baby syndrome. Nitrate levels may rise quickly for short periods of time because of rainfall or agricultural activity. If you are caring for an infant you should ask advice from your health care provider.
Arsenic
Arsenic is a mineral that occurs naturally in the earth’s crust. When
problems. Cryptosporidium
Cryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite that is common in surface waters. Ingestion of Cryptosporidium may cause cryptosporidiosis, an abdominal infection. Cryptosporidium is introduced into our source waters via wild animal populations and potentially via domestic livestock. Although the organism is readily removed by the conventional treatment process utilized at the Canyon Road Water Treatment facility, the oocyst, or transmission stage of the organism, is resistant to chemical disinfectants like chlorine and is the primary reason to determine if additional treatment is required.
In April 2007 the City began a
Any new water system treating surface water is required to monitor Cryptosporidium for 24 consecutive months. At the BDD the initial monitoring of untreated Rio Grande water for Cryptosporidium resulted in measured concentrations ranging from 0 to 0.4 oocysts/L. BDD began a second round of sampling starting in October 2015 and ending September 2017. No Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected during the second round of sampling except in a single measurement in July 2017 of 0.1 oocysts/L. Consequently no additional treatment at the Buckman Regional Water Treatment Facility is necessary.
Sodium
Sodium levels for all Santa Fe entry points range from 8.5 to 33 PPM. The
Voluntary Monitoring
For the results of additional voluntary monitoring for the Canyon Road WTP, and the BRWTP, please see the City’s Water Quality page at www.santafenm.gov/water_ quality. To view voluntary monitoring results, go to the link for “2015 Water Quality Report”. Data in the report lists results from voluntary monitoring at entry points into the distribution system associated with BRWTP, and the Canyon Road WTP. Since these samples are collected at the point of entry of water into the City’s distribution system, the reported concentrations of contaminants may be further diluted in the distribution system through mixing with water from other City sources.
EPA has established secondary maximum contaminant levels (SMCL) for certain contaminants. Secondary Standards are
For the results of additional voluntary monitoring see the Buckman Direct Diversion website at www.bddproject. org. To view voluntary monitoring results click the “Quality” tab and then go to “Monitoring, Testing, and Reporting” followed by “Water Quality Sampling Reports.”
Monitoring for LANL
Derived Contaminants
In cooperation with Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and the New Mexico Environment Department, the City currently monitors Buckman Wells 1, 6 and 8 for Laboratory- derived contamination on a quarterly basis. Samples are analyzed for radionuclides, general inorganic chemicals, metals, high explosives and organics. This repeat sampling has occurred during the years 2001 – 2020 and has indicated that
Microbial and Disinfection
Byproducts Rule
The Microbial and Disinfection Byproducts (M/DBP) Rules are a set of interrelated regulations that address risks from microbial pathogens and disinfectants/ disinfection byproducts (DBPs). The Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection By- Products Rule (DBPR) focuses on public health protection by limiting exposure to DBPs (known carcinogens), specifically total trihalomethanes (TTHM), five haloacetic acids (HAA5), and bromate which can form in water through disinfectants used to control microbial pathogens.
The City of Santa Fe system has eight compliance sampling locations for TTHM and HAA5. Each location is sampled once per quarter. The average of analytical results for DBPs at a given location during the previous four quarterly samples is called the locational running annual average (LRAA). The LRAA at each location must be below the MCL (60 PPB for HAA5 and 80 PPB for TTHM). Results shown in the Table below indicate that the system is in compliance.
|
MCL† MCLG† |
Sample |
Highest |
Range 2020‡ |
Typical Source |
|||
|
Year |
LRAA† |
||||||
Haloacetic |
|
|
|
|
|
Low † |
High † |
|
Acids |
60 |
NA |
|
2020 |
28 |
6.8 |
28 |
drinking water |
(HAA5s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chlorination |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Low † |
High † |
|
Trihalo- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
NA |
|
2020 |
53 |
19 |
60 |
drinking water |
|
methane |
|
|||||||
|
chlorination |
|||||||
(TTHMs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
† = units are PPB (ug/L) |
‡ = individual samples at all locations |
Bromate monitoring is required at the entrance to the distribution system whenever ozone is used to treat drinking water. BRWTP is the only treated water source that supplies ozonated water to the City of Santa Fe. Compliance is based on the running annual average (RAA) of monthly samples collected from BRWTP finished water. The results are summarized in the table below and indicate that the levels were in compliance with bromate requirements for all of 2020.
|
|
|
Sample |
Average |
Range |
2020 ‡ |
Typical Source |
|
|
MCL† MCLG† |
Year |
LRAA† |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
Low † |
High † |
||
Bromate§ |
10 |
ZERO |
2020 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
||
drinking water |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
disinfection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
† = units are PPB (ug/L)
- = monitoring required at BRWTP only. Compliance value is based on running annual average (RAA) of quarterly averages of the monthly finished water results.
The Stage 2 DBPR also regulates the maximum residual for disinfectants: chlorine dioxide, free chlorine, and chloramines. The disinfectants are water additives used to control microorganisms, particularly as a residual disinfectant in distribution system pipes.
The City of Santa Fe water system uses free chlorine as a disinfectant. For the year 2020, sampling was performed at 80 monitoring locations each month. The results are summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
Sample |
Maximum |
Violation Typical Source |
|||
|
MRDL† MRDLG† Year |
RAA† |
Range 2020 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
Low † |
High † |
|
Water |
Chlorine |
4.0 |
4 |
2020 |
0.47 |
0.34 |
0.47 |
NO |
additives used |
Residual |
to control |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
microbes |
- = units are PPM (mg/L)
Lead and Copper Rule
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. The City of Santa Fe is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, and removing lead pipes, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components in your home. You share the responsibility for protecting yourself and your family from the lead in your home plumbing. You can take responsibility by identifying and removing lead materials within your home plumbing and taking steps to reduce your family’s risk. Before drinking tap water, flush your pipes for several minutes by running your tap, taking a shower, doing laundry or a load of dishes. You can also use a filter certified by an American National Standards Institute accredited certifier to reduce lead in drinking water. If you are concerned about lead in your water and wish to have your water tested, contact the City of Santa Fe at (505)
Tests for lead and copper are taken from customer taps located throughout the City once every three years. The most recent round of lead and copper testing took place in September 2018. Results for both lead and copper, summarized in the following table, were below the required Action Level (AL) - the concentration which, if exceeded, triggers additional treatment or other requirements.
Inorganic Contaminants |
MCLG |
AL* |
City Levels (90 |
Sampleof# <AL |
SampleDate |
ExceedsAL |
Typical Source |
||
|
|
|
Water |
percentile)** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
th |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Erosion of natural |
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
deposits; Leaching from |
|||
(PPM) |
1.3 |
1.3 |
0.37 |
of |
2018 |
No |
wood preservatives; |
||
Corrosion of household |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
plumbing systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
September |
|
Corrosion of |
|
Lead |
|
|
|
|
|
household plumbing |
|||
0 |
15 |
1.8 |
of |
2018 |
No |
||||
(PPB) |
systems; Erosion of |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural deposits |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- AL = Action Level
- Results of monitoring are used to determine the concentration at the 90th percentile (e.g., if 100 samples analyzed, the concentration at the 90th highest sample). Based on the number of samples analyzed in 2018 the 90th percentile is the 28th ranked sample for copper and lead.
2020
City of Santa Fe
Water Quality Table
The table on the following page lists contaminants which:
- have associated primary Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) that are regulated and
- were detected in testing conducted by the City and New Mexico Environment Department.
The table includes only those constituents found above detection limits during 2020 sampling, or during sampling in previous years if not analyzed during 2020. The EPA requires monitoring for certain contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations are not expected to vary significantly from year to year. The City is required to test for over 80 contaminants, and the vast majority of these contaminants were not found above detection limits. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of these contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Safe Drinking Water Hotline (800)
Please view separate 2020 Water Quality Table
(on the reverse side of this page)
Conserve Water...
every drop counts
For information regarding the City’s water conservation program, ways to conserve, and rebates, please contact the City’s Water Conservation Hotline at (505)
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2021.indd 2
4/21/2021 8:49:15 AM
Contaminants
City of Santa Fe Water System
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the New Mexico Environment Department, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 78000
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Surface water
- Total: 26
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Arsenic
- Bromodichloromethane
- Chloroform
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Dibromochloromethane
- Dichloroacetic acid
- Nitrate and nitrite
- Radium%2C combined (-226 & -228)
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
- Trichloroacetic acid
Other Detected Contaminants
- 1%2C4-Dioxane
- Barium
- Bromoform
- Chlorate
- Chromium (total)
- Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
- Dibromoacetic acid
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Molybdenum
- Monobromoacetic acid
- Monochloroacetic acid
- Selenium
- Strontium
- Uranium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.