Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Sioux City?
Yes, Sioux City's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Sioux City has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page or the city's water provider website.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Sioux City's water utility, Sioux City Water Supply, had 2 health-based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. The last violation for Sioux City was resolved on Dec. 31, 2019. This assessment is based on the Sioux City Water Supply water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Sioux City Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Sioux City tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Sioux City's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Sioux City Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named Sioux City Water Supply for Sioux City in Iowa. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
From Oct. 1, 2019 to Dec. 31, 2019, Sioux City had 1 health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average which falls into the Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule rule code group, and the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: TTHM.
From July 1, 2019 to Sept. 30, 2019, Sioux City had 1 health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average which falls into the Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule rule code group, and the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: TTHM.
From March 6, 2017 to March 7, 2017, Sioux City had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Treatment Techniques which falls into the Other rule code group, and the Miscellaneous rule code family for the following contaminant code: Epichlorohydrin.
From Nov. 25, 2016 to Nov. 26, 2016, Sioux City had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Treatment Techniques which falls into the Other rule code group, and the Miscellaneous rule code family for the following contaminant code: Epichlorohydrin.
From May 19, 2016 to May 20, 2016, Sioux City had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Treatment Techniques which falls into the Other rule code group, and the Miscellaneous rule code family for the following contaminant code: Epichlorohydrin.
From May 1, 2015 to May 31, 2015, Sioux City had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From July 1, 2012 to July 31, 2012, Sioux City had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From June 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012, Sioux City had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From April 1, 2012 to April 30, 2012, Sioux City had 1 health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Treatment Technique Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Surface Water Treatment Rule.
Is there Lead in Sioux City Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Sioux City water system, Sioux City Water Supply, between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.002 mg/L of lead in Sioux City water. This is 13.3% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Sioux City contained more lead.
While Sioux City water testing may have found 0.002 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Sioux City Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be at least one military base - Sioux Gateway Municipal Airport - near Sioux City with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Sioux City has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
Sioux City SDWA Violation History Table - Prior 10 Years
Compliance Period | Status | Health-Based? | Category Code | Code | Rule Code | Contaminant Code | Rule Group Code | Rule Family Code |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/01/2019 - 12/31/2019 | Resolved | Yes | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation (MCL) | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average (02) | Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (220) | TTHM (2950) | Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (200) | Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (220) |
07/01/2019 - 09/30/2019 | Resolved | Yes | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation (MCL) | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average (02) | Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (220) | TTHM (2950) | Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (200) | Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (220) |
03/06/2017 - 03/07/2017 | Resolved | No | Other Violation (Other) | Treatment Techniques (07) | Miscellaneous (430) | Epichlorohydrin (2257) | Other (400) | Miscellaneous (430) |
11/25/2016 - 11/26/2016 | Resolved | No | Other Violation (Other) | Treatment Techniques (07) | Miscellaneous (430) | Epichlorohydrin (2257) | Other (400) | Miscellaneous (430) |
05/19/2016 - 05/20/2016 | Resolved | No | Other Violation (Other) | Treatment Techniques (07) | Miscellaneous (430) | Epichlorohydrin (2257) | Other (400) | Miscellaneous (430) |
05/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) (38) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
07/01/2012 - 07/31/2012 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) (36) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (121) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (0200) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
06/01/2012 - 06/30/2012 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) (36) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (121) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (0200) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
04/01/2012 - 04/30/2012 | Resolved | Yes | Treatment Technique Violation (TT) | Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR) (41) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (121) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (0200) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
Sioux City Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Mail: | ATTN BRAD PUETZ WATER SUPT 1101 TRI VIEW AVE SIOUX CITY, IA, 51103 |
Existing customers can login to their Sioux City Water Supply account to pay their Sioux City water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your Sioux City Water Supply bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Sioux City water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Sioux City water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Sioux City means you will often need to put the water in your name with Sioux City Water Supply. In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Sioux City means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with Sioux City Water Supply. In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$1.83 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Sioux City, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Sioux City Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Sioux City's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT
FOR
SIOUX CITY WATER SUPPLY
GENERAL INFORMATION
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water posed a health risk. More information about contaminants or potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno- compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EPA/CDC guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. SIOUX CITY WATER SUPPLY is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead.
SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
This water supply obtains its water from the sand and gravel of the Alluvial aquifer. The Alluvial aquifer was determined to be highly susceptible to contamination because the characteristics of the aquifer and overlying materials provide little protection from contamination at the land surface. The Alluvial wells will be highly susceptible to surface contaminants such as leaking underground storage tanks, contaminant spills, and excess fertilizer application. A detailed evaluation of your source water was completed by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, and is available from the Water Operator at
This water supply obtains its water from the sand and gravel and sandstone of the
This water supply obtains water from one or more surface waters. Surface water sources are susceptible to sources of contamination within the drainage basin.
Surface Water Name |
Susceptibility |
Missouri River |
high |
OTHER INFORMATION
Turbidity is an indicator of treatment filter performance and is regulated as a treatment technique.
CONTACT INFORMATION
For questions regarding this information or how you can get involved in decisions regarding the water system, please contact SIOUX CITY WATER SUPPLY at
The table below shows the primary contaminants found in our drinking water in 2020. All of the regulated substances in our drinking water were well within the limits EPA has set to ensure the safety of tap water. Sioux City tested for many
2020 Water Quality
Regulated
Contaminants
Microbiological |
Detected |
Range |
MCL |
MCLG |
Units |
Possible Sources of |
Notes |
||
Contaminants |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
Contaminants |
|
||
Turbidity |
0.782 |
0.025 |
MCLG |
N/A |
NTU |
Soil Runoff. |
99.25% below 0.3 NTU |
||
Inorganic & Organic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arsenic |
2 |
N/A |
10 |
0 |
ppb |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff from orchards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff from glass and electronic production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wastes |
|
|
Sodium (A) |
63 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
ppm |
Erosion of natural deposits. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Added to water during treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
process |
|
|
Nitrate |
|
2.2 |
N/A |
N/A |
10 |
ppm |
Erosion of natural deposits and runoff |
|
|
Total Organic Carbon - |
3.61 |
TT |
N/A |
|
Naturally present in the environment |
|
|||
Average % Removed |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barium |
0.05 |
|
2 |
2 |
ppm |
Discharge from metal refineries |
|
||
Disinfection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Trihalomethanes |
78 |
(45 - 130) |
80 |
N/A |
ppb |
|
|||
Total Haloacetic Acids |
30 |
(19 - 43) |
60 |
N/A |
ppb |
|
|||
Disinfectant |
Detected |
Range |
MRDL |
MRDLG |
Units |
|
|
|
|
Chlorine (Cl2) |
1.028 |
1.028 - 4.394 |
4 |
4 |
ppm |
Water additive used to control microbes |
|
||
Radiochemical |
Detected |
Range |
MCL |
MCLG |
Units |
Possible Sources of |
|
||
Contaminants |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
Contaminants |
|
||
Alpha Emitters |
5.5 |
|
15 |
0 |
pCi/L |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
||
Combined Radium |
0.8 |
|
5 |
0 |
pCi/L |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
||
Cryptosporidium |
No detects |
in previous |
sampling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giardia |
No detects in previous sampling |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Lead & Copper |
|
Action |
90th |
|
|
|
Possible |
Sources of |
|
|
|
Level |
Percentile |
|
|
Units |
Contaminants |
|
|
Lead (B) |
2 |
(ND - 4) |
|
|
ppb |
Corrosion of household plumbing systems |
|
||
Copper |
0.5 |
(ND - 0.9) |
|
|
ppm |
Corrosion of household plumbing systems |
|
- There is not a federal or state standard for sodium. Monitoring is required to provide information to consumers that are concerned about sodium intake due to dietary precautions. While our water is relatively low in sodium, water softeners that use Sodium raises the level considerably. If you are cutting back on sodium, try attaching your water softener to only hot water lines, or not attaching the kitchen faucet to the softener.
-
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing.
The Sioux City Water Plant is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may request to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods
and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http:/www.epa.gov/safewater/lead.
Key to the Water Quality Table
Radiochemical
Total Coliforms- Group of bacteria which are not harmful themselves but, if present in water, may indicate contamination with other harmful bacteria.
2020 Water Quality
Regulated
Contaminants
Microbiological |
Detected |
Range |
MCL |
MCLG |
Units |
Possible Sources of |
Notes |
|
Contaminants |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
Contaminants |
|
|
Turbidity |
0.151 |
.016 |
TT/0.5 |
N/A |
NTU |
Soil Runoff. |
99.9% below 0.1 NTU |
|
Inorganic & Organic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluoride |
0.96 |
.45 |
4 |
4 |
ppm |
See Sources of Contaminants above |
|
|
Sodium (A) |
71 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
ppm |
Erosion of natural deposits. |
|
|
Contaminants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptosporidium |
No detects in previous sampling |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Giardia |
No detects in previous sampling |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Disinfectant |
Detected |
Range |
MRDL |
MRDLG |
Units |
|
|
|
Chlorine (Cl2) |
0.389 |
.389 - 4.991 |
4 |
4 |
ppm |
Water additive used to control microbes |
|
|
Radiochemical |
Detected |
Range |
MCL |
MCLG |
Units |
Possible Sources of |
|
|
Contaminants |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
Contaminants |
|
|
Alpha Emitters |
2.2 |
N/A |
15 |
0 |
pCi/L |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
2020 Water Quality
Regulated
Contaminants
Disinfectant |
Detected |
Range |
MRDL |
MRDLG |
Units |
Possible Sources of Contaminants |
Notes |
|
Chlorine (Cl2) |
1.33 |
(ND - 4.10) |
4 |
4 |
ppm |
Water additive used to control microbes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***See Note Below |
Seven positive samples |
|
Total Coliform Bacteria |
7 |
N/A |
N/A |
RTCR |
TT |
***Coliforms are bacteria that are naturally present in the environment and are used as an indicator that other waterborne pathogens may be present, or that a potential pathway exists through which contamination may enter the drinking water
2020 4th Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR4)
There were no detects during the 2020 sample collection period
UCMR Results can be viewed by the public:
- At https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr
- In annual Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs)
- Required by §141.153(d)(7) Community water systems (CWSs)
- Detected unregulated contaminants, for which monitoring is required (except Cryptosporidium), the table(s) must contain the average and range at which the contaminant was detected. The report may include a brief explanation of the reasons for monitoring for unregulated contaminants.
- Example language: unregulated contaminants are those, for which EPA has not established drinking water standards. The purpose of unregulated contaminant monitoring is to assist EPA in determining the occurrence of unregulated contaminants in drinking water and whether future regulation is warranted.
- For additional information: https://www.epa.gov/ccr
Contaminants
Sioux City Water Supply
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 82759
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Purchased groundwater under influence of surface water
- Total: 23
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Arsenic
- Bromodichloromethane
- Chloroform
- Dibromochloromethane
- Dichloroacetic acid
- Nitrate
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
- Trichloroacetic acid
Other Detected Contaminants
- 1%2C1-Dichloroethane
- 1%2C4-Dioxane
- Bromoform
- Chlorate
- Chlorodifluoromethane
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Chromium (total)
- cis-1%2C2-Dichloroethylene
- Cobalt
- Dibromoacetic acid
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Molybdenum
- Monochloroacetic acid
- Strontium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.
Sources and Resources
Sources Cited
Additional Resources
You may not think that drinking tap water is a big deal but the truth is it can be. The drinking of tap water from your own tap can cause health problems including headaches, acne and stomachaches, to name a few.
There are also reports that drinking unfiltered tap water is linked to cancers such as cancer of the cervix and bladder, cancer of the breast and bladder and cancer of the pancreas. If you''re an American, you owe it to yourself to learn more about the risks of drinking unfiltered water. Even if you live in Sioux City, South Dakota, you should make it a habit to test your tap water for contaminants.
In fact, when I was growing up I remember my mother always told me to test the tap water before drinking. I would only be testing about once a month. Now, if I don''t get a positive result for a particular contaminant, I will just assume I''m not getting what I should be drinking and then take corrective action.
Of course, drinking un